Skip to content

Preview · not officially published. Technical information only; the planned DLT is not live.

ByteShares.org

Layers

Identity Layer / eIDspot

Documented architecture

eIDspot is the working name for the identity concept in the ByteShares architecture. This page records the concept as written. No identity service exists, none is issuing or verifying credentials, and no personal data is processed by this platform.

Source / verification
Owner-asserted canon; credential formats not specified
Document version
Not yet assigned
Last reviewed
19 September 2026

Concept as documented

The identity layer holds a subject identifier and a set of credentials that can be presented as proofs, so a participant can demonstrate an attribute without disclosing the underlying record. Presentation is selective: a verifier receives the minimum needed for the decision at hand.

The identifier, the credential issued about it, and the presentation made from that credential are kept distinct. That separation is what allows a credential to be reused without re-exposing its contents.

Subject classes

Documented subject classes and what identity establishes for each
ClassWhat identity establishesState
Verified humanA natural person whose verification was performed by a named issuer.Documented; issuer model undecided
InstitutionAn organisation, its representatives and the limits of their mandates.Documented
ContributorA participant whose contribution is recognised under a defined scope.Documented
AI-adjacent agentAn agent acting under a named curator and a bounded authority, per the F.I.P. concept.Planned; specification unavailable

Identity to evidence

Documented architecture
  1. 01

    Identity

    A verified subject exists and can be referenced without re-disclosing its source records.

  2. 02

    Mandate

    An authority is granted to that subject, with an explicit scope, issuer and validity period.

  3. 03

    Policy

    Rules determine which mandates permit which actions under which conditions.

  4. 04

    Action

    The subject acts, presenting only the proofs the rule requires.

  5. 05

    Evidence

    A proof object records who acted, under which mandate and rule version, and with what outcome.

Credential and verification lifecycle

Credential lifecycle stages and their current specification state
StageIntended behaviourState
VerificationA named issuer verifies an attribute against its own evidence.Issuer model undecided
IssuanceA credential is issued to the subject, held by the subject.Format not specified
PresentationA scoped proof is derived for a specific decision.Format not specified
RenewalValidity periods expire and are renewed rather than assumed permanent.Policy not set
RevocationStatus becomes checkable and immediate for later evaluations, while prior proofs remain valid for their time.Planned; mechanism undecided

Privacy and data minimization

Minimum disclosure

Documented architecture

A verifier receives a decision-relevant proof, not a document set.

Custody stays with the source

Documented architecture

Underlying identity evidence remains with its custodian and is not published to any ledger.

No correlation by default

Planned

Avoiding cross-context linkability is a stated goal; the mechanism is undecided.

Account and key

Documented architecture

An account is the subject of record; a key is a control mechanism. Key rotation must not change the subject, and wallet-as-account never means a bare address grants entitlement.

Relationship to VPLedger and governance

The identity layer supplies subject, eligibility and delegated-authority proofs; governance grants and withdraws mandates; the ledger records what was accepted and under which authority. Each keeps its own responsibility: identity never decides policy, and the ledger never grants authority.

Boundaries

  • No sign-in exists on ByteShares.org. Member sign-in belongs to ByteShares.dk.
  • No credential issuance, revocation or verification is running.
  • No conformance with any national or EU identity scheme is claimed; such alignment would require formal assessment first.

Open questions

Credential format
Not decided
Revocation mechanism
Not decided
Issuer model
Not decided
Key custody
Not decided
External assessment
Not started
Operational service
None

Evidence register

Each statement on this page is tracked against a source. A claim without a verified source is never presented as fact.

Claims on this page and the verification state of their sources
ClaimSource typeVerificationNote
eIDspot is the name of the identity conceptOwner instructionVerified source on fileName provided by the project owner.
Subject classes, mandate chain and lifecycle modelMaster Business Plan v2.1 / aligned canonSource claimed, not yet verifiedOwner-asserted; the cited document has not been supplied for inspection.
Credential and revocation formatsSpecificationNo source on fileMarked to be specified rather than invented.
Compliance with any identity regulation or schemeFormal assessmentNo source on fileNo assessment has taken place; no compliance is claimed.