Deterministic rule execution
Documented architectureThe same declared inputs, authorized rule version and prior state are intended to produce the same outcome. Hidden application logic is outside the canonical model.
Preview · not officially published. Technical information only; the planned DLT is not live.
Layers
VPLedger is the working name for the value and participation ledger described in the architecture. This page records the model as written. There is no ledger instance, no genesis state, no balances and no transactions.
Not live
VPLedger is not operating. Nothing on this page reports real activity, and no operational figures are shown, because no verified operational data source exists yet.
The ledger is described as an append-only record of entries. An entry references the participant it concerns, the kind of contribution or transfer it represents, and the moment it was accepted. Entries are described as never edited: a correction is itself a new entry that refers back to the one it corrects.
Two kinds of record are distinguished in the drafts: value entries, which track transferable amounts, and participation entries, which track contribution that is recognised but not transferable. The separation is deliberate, so that recognition of work cannot be traded as if it were value.
The same declared inputs, authorized rule version and prior state are intended to produce the same outcome. Hidden application logic is outside the canonical model.
Each accepted transition should retain its inputs, authority, rule reference, timestamp and link to prior state so the result can be reconstructed.
Eligibility and authority proofs gate who may submit, approve or receive a particular state transition.
Accounting state is append-only, reconciliable and attributable; correction occurs through a linked compensating entry rather than silent mutation.
These are documented invariants. No execution engine, proof verifier or production accounting system is running.
Creation → escrow → settlement. Each stage records the governing terms, authority, state change and evidence reference.
Proposal → vote → authorization. The proof binds eligibility, threshold evaluation and authorized outcome.
A scoped proof states that a condition was satisfied under a named rule without requiring unrelated source data to be exposed.
A bounded, reproducible extract links selected entries, rule versions and evidence references to an anchored snapshot for independent review.
A Merkle snapshot is the documented proof primitive for committing a defined record set at an epoch boundary. Its root can be anchored with the timestamp and rule context; an inclusion path then verifies a selected record without disclosing the full set.
Snapshot format, hashing profile, epoch policy and verifier are not yet implemented or fixed.
| Kept on-chain | Kept off-chain | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| Rule references and versions | Full rule text and rationale | The commitment must be small; the material must stay readable. |
| Hashes and timestamps | The documents and records they commit to | A hash proves the artefact without disclosing it. |
| Accounting state transitions | Supporting commercial and identity evidence | Accounting must be reconstructable without exposing source data. |
| Evidence references | The evidence itself, under custody | Custody and retention stay explicit and revocable. |
Content-addressed storage is the documented direction for durable evidence, with a Filecoin rail recorded only as planned positioning. No storage rail is contracted or in use, and hash construction, reference format and retention obligations are to be specified.
Each example shows where a proof object would be produced. None can be executed today.
A
Terms and authority are bound at creation, the escrow condition is recorded, and settlement produces a proof referencing both earlier stages.
B
Proposal, eligibility and threshold evaluation resolve into an authority record that execution can reference.
C
A scoped proof states that a named condition held, without disclosing the underlying documents.
D
A bounded set of entries, rule versions and evidence references is tied to an anchored snapshot for independent review.
Each statement on this page is tracked against a source. A claim without a verified source is never presented as fact.
| Claim | Source type | Verification | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Append-only entry model with value/participation split | Master Business Plan v2.1 / aligned canon | Source claimed, not yet verified | Owner-asserted; the cited document has not been supplied, and the source provenance audit remains open. |
| Proof objects and deterministic execution model | Owner-provided aligned technical canon | Source claimed, not yet verified | Documented model only; schemas, hashing and snapshot formats are to be specified, not invented. |
| Any balance, supply or transaction figure | Ledger state | No source on file | No ledger exists; no figures are shown anywhere on this platform. |