01
Identity
Establish the subject, credentials and eligible authority.
Preview · not officially published. Technical information only; the planned DLT is not live.
Layers
A written description of how the intended stack is layered and where responsibilities sit. No implementation is claimed by this page, and no layer below is running.
These are stated design intentions taken from internal drafts. They describe how the system is meant to be built, not how anything behaves today.
01
Establish the subject, credentials and eligible authority.
02
Determine the applicable mandate, proposal and authorization.
03
Produce verifiable objects for rules, events and outcomes.
04
Preserve a reviewable history and evidence references.
05
Expose authorized protocol functions without becoming the source of truth.
06
Coordinate eligible exchange and allocation under explicit rules.
07
Provide replaceable interfaces for people and institutions.
The sequence is a documented responsibility flow, not a deployed processing pipeline.
Subject identifiers, credentials and proof presentation.
Recording value and participation entries as an append-only history.
Proposal, role and threshold objects expressed as protocol data.
Roles, responsibilities and message flow between participating nodes.
Read and write surfaces intended for applications and explorers.
Rules, hashes, timestamps, accounting state and references form the compact verification surface. Anchors prove that referenced material and state existed in a particular form; they do not need to contain the durable evidence itself.
Documents, attestations and other evidentiary payloads remain under explicit custody and retention controls, linked by content proofs. This separates public verification from unnecessary disclosure.
Filecoin is a planned durable-storage option in the architecture. No storage agreement, integration, retrieval path or operational data is claimed.
A Merkle root can commit to a defined set of records at an epoch boundary. Inclusion proofs can then verify one record against the snapshot without exposing or replaying the full set.
The canonical model describes functions, not investment products, prices, yields, markets or live assets.
Participation and value-accounting function within the VPLedger model.
Unit function for accounting for a defined quantity of digital storage capacity.
Higher-order storage-capacity accounting function related to the TIB unit.
Recognition and participation function within the canonical value model.
Citizenship or community-eligibility function used to express scoped participation.
Growth and contribution-allocation function in the documented model.
Conditional bridge concepts for representing externally verifiable value or asset references under governed rules. Inclusion depends on technical, legal, custody and source verification; no bridge or wrapped asset exists here.
Identity, credential and eligibility-proof function for subjects and authorized agents.
Proposed development and delivery function for governed digital services and institutional workflows; no operational service is claimed.
Productized operational implementation concept of the broader eDEV function; not a deployed city platform or service.
Proposed discovery and exchange interface for eligible storage-related records and services; no market or exchange is operating.
ByteShares' intended long-term end-product family: an extensible modular environment with expandable white-label modules for different organisations, sectors and markets. Institutional access would be bounded by identity, authority and audit requirements. UCityX is a separate planned concept; neither is deployed.
Each statement on this page is tracked against a source. A claim without a verified source is never presented as fact.
| Claim | Source type | Verification | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Layer names and responsibilities | Owner-stated canon; Master Business Plan v2.1 not inspected | Source claimed, not yet verified | The owner describes the intended layers; the cited source document and implementation remain unverified. |
| Storage, asset functions and infrastructure module positioning | Owner-stated aligned technical canon | Source claimed, not yet verified | Descriptions follow owner direction; underlying specification documents have not been inspected and nothing is operating. |
| Any performance or throughput characteristic | Benchmark output | No source on file | No benchmarks exist; no figures shown. |